Following the large scale nuclear power plant failure in Japan, a StatCrunch survey was conducted in which respondents were asked about their level of concern over nuclear power and their political party. The data were coded so that 1 represented the lowest level of concern and 100 the greatest level of concern. See the following output. Do a complete analysis using ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05.
Do post-hoc tests based on the intervals given. Remember that an interval for a difference that captures 0 shows that there could be no difference in population means. Use the underlining method, listing the parties from the party with the lowest mean on the left to the party with the highest mean on the right, and underline any pairs or groups of three that are not significantly different. Finally, write your conclusions in sentences. For the purpose of this exercise, treat the respondents as a random sample of all StatCrunch users.

Transcribed Image Text:

Options Analysis of Varlance results Responses in Concen Factors in Party Factor means Party M std. dev Std. Error 13063.3 33.674145 2 9534179 Independent 96 58.385417 31.960953 3.2620011 77 57.454545 36.335261 4.1407873 Repubican85 43.505882 34.661157 3.7595303 ANOVA table Source ss MStat P-value Treatments 320771 643 6923.88 5.980431 0.0005 Error 384 444578.38 1157.7562 Total 387 465350.02 Tukey 95% simultaneous confidence intervals: Democrat subtracted from Independent-4.9145833 -16729436 6.9002697 Difference Lower Upper P-value 0.706 58454545-18.470982 67800729 0.6306 other Republican-19.794118 32.040829-7.5474062 0.0002 Independent suberacted from Difference Lower Upper P value 0.93087121 -14.362339 12 500596 0.998 other Republcan14.879534-27.955555-1.9035135 0.0184 Other subtracted fromm Difference Lower Upper P-value Republican -13.948663 27.76153-0,13578823 0.0468