Question: From an ethical perspective, if LJL had been allowed to invoke the right-to-cure provision, could it have undone its wrongdoing so that the franchise relationship
From an ethical perspective, if LJL had been allowed to invoke the right-to-cure provision, could it have undone its wrongdoing so that the franchise relationship could have continued? Why or why not?
Pilot Air Freight Corporation moves freight through a network of company-owned and company franchised locations at airports and other sites. Franchisees included LJL Transportation, Inc., which is owned by Louis Pektor and Leo Decker. The franchise agreement required LJL to assign all shipments to the Pilot network. The agreement also provided that “Pilot shall allow Franchisee an opportunity to cure a default within ninety (90) days of receipt of written notice.” After eight years as a Pilot franchisee, LJL began to divert shipments to Northeast Transportation, a competing service owned by Pektor and Decker.
Step by Step Solution
3.39 Rating (183 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Probably not No amount of payment for LJLs theft could restore Pilots business trust and confiden... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
193-L-B-L-E (4).docx
120 KBs Word File
