“If we can get that new robot to combine with our other automated equipment, we’ll have a complete flexible manufacturing system (FMS) in place in our Northridge plant,” said Hal Swain, production manager for Diller Products.

“Let’s just hope that reduced labor and inventory costs can justify its acquisition,” replied Linda

Wycoff, the controller. “Otherwise, we’ll never get it. You know how the president feels about equipment paying for itself out of reduced costs.”

Selected data relating to the robot are provided below:

Cost of the robot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,600,000

Software and installation . . . . . . . . . . . $700,000

Annual savings in labor costs . . . . . . . ?

Annual savings in inventory

carrying costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $190,000

Monthly increase in power and

maintenance costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,500

Salvage value in 12 years . . . . . . . . . . . . $90,000

Useful life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 years

Engineering studies suggest that use of the robot will result in a savings of 20,000 direct labor-hours each year. The labor rate is $16 per hour. Also, the smoother work flow made possible by the FMS will allow the company to reduce the amount of inventory on hand by $300,000. The released funds will be available for use elsewhere in the company. This inventory reduction will take place in the first year of operation. The company’s required rate of return is 20%.

Required:

(Ignore income taxes.)

1. Determine the net annual cost savings if the robot is purchased. (Do not include the $300,000 inventory reduction or the Salvage value in this computation.)

2. Compute the net present value of the proposed investment in the robot. Based on these data, would you recommend that the robot be purchased? Explain.

3. Assume that the robot is purchased. At the end of the first year, Linda Wycoff has found that some items didn’t work out as planned. Due to unforeseen problems, software and installation costs were $125,000 more than estimated, and direct labor has been reduced by only 17,500 hours per year, rather than by 20,000 hours. Assuming that all other cost data were accurate, does it appear that the company made a wise investment? Show computations, using the net present value format as in (2) above.

4. Upon seeing your analysis in (3) above, the president stated, “That robot is the worst investment we’ve ever made. And here we’ll be stuck with it for years.”

a. Explain to the president what benefits other than cost savings might accrue from using the new robot and FMS.

b. Compute for the president the dollar amount of cash inflow that would be needed each year from the benefits in (a) above in order for the equipment to yield a 20% rate of return.