In Shelanu v. Three Print, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that franchisors owe a duty of

Question:

In Shelanu v. Three Print, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that franchisors owe a duty of good faith to franchisees. What factors led the court to this conclusion? In what other contractual relationships might one party owe the other party a duty of good faith? What does “good faith” mean? How can franchisors comply with good faith obligations?