Question: In the previous question, one example assumed that banks kept a 100% reserve ratio. Some economists have recommended that all banks be required by law

In the previous question, one example assumed that banks kept a 100% reserve ratio. Some economists have recommended that all banks be required by law to keep 100% of their deposits in the bank vault, at the Federal Reserve, or invested in ultra safe investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury bills.
a. If this happened, what would be money multiplier be equal to?
b. If this happened, would the interest rate on bank deposits probably go up or down?
c. If this happened, would people be more likely or less likely to invest their savings in bank alternatives, such as bonds, mutual funds, or their cousin’s lawn mowing business?

Step by Step Solution

3.37 Rating (163 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a With 100 reserves the money multiplier would equal 1 b With 100 reserv... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

651-B-E-M-E (3210).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!