Question: Lantz (2013) identified that the Kruskal-Wallis test ... should be the primary [test] used to compare [differences] when it is known that populations are not

Lantz (2013) identified that "the Kruskal-Wallis test ... should be the primary [test] used to compare [differences] when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal". Explain why this statement is true for the Kruskal-Wallis test, and for nonparametric tests in general.

Step by Step Solution

3.46 Rating (146 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Hence for the final analysis we can say that non... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1273-M-S-L-R(9482).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Statistics Questions!