Question: Lantz (2013) identified that the Kruskal-Wallis test ... should be the primary [test] used to compare [differences] when it is known that populations are not
Lantz (2013) identified that "the Kruskal-Wallis test ... should be the primary [test] used to compare [differences] when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal". Explain why this statement is true for the Kruskal-Wallis test, and for nonparametric tests in general.
Step by Step Solution
3.46 Rating (146 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Hence for the final analysis we can say that non... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
1273-M-S-L-R(9482).docx
120 KBs Word File
