MM's proposition 1 suggests that in the absence of taxes it makes no difference whether the firm
Question:
MM's proposition 1 suggests that in the absence of taxes it makes no difference whether the firm borrows on behalf of its shareholders or whether they borrow directly. However, if there are corporate taxes, this is no longer the case. Construct a simple example to show that with taxes it is better for the firm to borrow than for the shareholders to do so.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Fundamentals of Corporate Finance
ISBN: 978-0077861629
8th edition
Authors: Richard Brealey, Stewart Myers, Alan Marcus
Question Posted: