Multiply Choice 1. Master Mfg., Inc. contracted with Accur Computer Repair Corp. to maintain Masters computer system.

Question:

Multiply Choice
1. Master Mfg., Inc. contracted with Accur Computer Repair Corp. to maintain Master’s computer system. Master’s manufacturing process depends on its computer system operating properly at all times. A liquidated damages clause in the contract provided that Accur would pay $1,000 to Master for each day that Accur was late responding to a service request. On January 12, Accur was notified that Master’s computer system had failed. Accur did not respond to Master’s service request until January 15. If Master sues Accur under the liquidated damage provision of the contract, Master will:
(a) Win, unless the liquidated damages provision is determined to be a penalty
(b) Win, because under all circumstances liquidated damage provisions are enforceable
(c) Lose, because Accur’s breach was not material
(d) Lose, because liquidated damage provisions violate public policy

2. Kaye contracted to sell Hodges a building for $310,000. The contract required Hodges to pay the entire amount at closing. Kaye refused to close the sale of the building. Hodges sued Kaye. To what relief is Hodges entitled?
(a) Punitive damages and direct damages
(b) Specific performance and direct damages
(c) Consequential damages or punitive damages
(d) Direct damages or specific performance

3. A manufacturer delivers a new tractor to Farmer Ted on the first day of the harvest season. But, the tractor will not start. It takes two weeks for the right parts to be delivered and installed. The repair bill comes to $1,000. During the two weeks, some acres of Farmer Ted’s crops die. He argues in court that his lost profit on those acres is $60,000. If a jury awards $1,000 for tractor repairs, it will be in the form of damages. If it awards $60,000 for the lost crops, it will be in the form of damages.
(a) Direct; direct
(b) Direct; consequential
(c) Consequential; direct
(d) Consequential; consequential
(e) Direct; incidental
4. Julie signs a contract to buy Nick’s 2002 Mustang GT for $5,000. Later, Nick changes his mind and refuses to sell his car. Julie soon buys a similar 2002 Mustang GT for $5,500. She then sues Nick and wins $500. The $500 represents her.
(a) Expectation interest
(b) Reliance interest
(c) Restitution interest
(d) None of the above

5. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a seller generally entitled to recover consequential damages, and a buyer generally entitled to recover consequential damages.
(a) Is; is
(b) Is; is not
(c) Is not; is
(d) Is not; is not


Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Business Law and the Legal Environment

ISBN: 978-1111530600

6th Edition

Authors: Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson, Dean A. Bredeson

Question Posted: