Patrick J. Buchanan, a former presidential candidate, argued in his book on the global economy that there is a flaw in David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage:
Classical free trade theory fails the test of common sense. According to Ricardo's law of comparative advantage ... if America makes better computers and textiles than China does, but our advantage in computers is greater than our advantage in textiles, we should (1) focus on computers, (2) let China make textiles, and (3) trade U.S. computers for Chinese textiles... . The doctrine begs a question. If Americans are more efficient than Chinese in making clothes ... why surrender the more efficient American industry? Why shift to a reliance on a Chinese textile industry that will take years to catch up to where American factories are today?
Do you agree with Buchanan's argument? Briefly explain.