Question: Procter and Gamble sold a detergent, Ace con Blanqueador, in Puerto Rico. It advertised that Mas blanco no se puede (Whiter is not possible). Clorox,
Procter and Gamble sold a detergent, Ace con Blanqueador, in Puerto Rico. It advertised that "Mas blanco no se puede" (Whiter is not possible). Clorox, a bleach maker, sued Procter and Gamble contending that the ad was false and misleading in violation of the Lanham Act. The district court dismissed the suit; Clorox appealed.
Did it have a suit for false advertising against its competitor under the Lanham Act? [Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. Procter and Gamble, 228 F.3d 24, 1st Cir. (2000)]
Step by Step Solution
3.23 Rating (167 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Dismissal vacated remanded for further proceedings To recover on a false advertising claim unde... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
154-L-B-L-L-E (1177).docx
120 KBs Word File
