If a plaintiff injures himself while misusing a hammer, a court could a. conclude that the manufacturer
Question:
If a plaintiff injures himself while misusing a hammer, a court could
a. conclude that the manufacturer had no duty to produce a hammer that could withstand this type of misuse.
b. conclude that the plaintiff’s actions were the proximate cause of his injuries.
c. require that the defendant raise the plaintiff’s misuse of the hammer as an affirmative defense.
d. all of the above.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: