Question: The null hypothesis being tested in Exercise 18.5 is the same as that in Exercise 18.3, but the alternatives are different: one implies exchangeability of

The null hypothesis being tested in Exercise 18.5 is the same as that in Exercise 18.3, but the alternatives are different: one implies exchangeability of block effects, the other does not. Discuss the implications of the fact that one statistic is strictly increasing as a function of \(F\), whereas the other is strictly decreasing for \(F<1\) and strictly increasing for \(F>1\).


Data From Exercise 18.5

Show that the REML estimate with positivity constraint satisfies \(1+b \hat{\theta}=\) \(\max (F, 1)\). What is the REML estimate for the second component? Express the constrained REML likelihood-ratio statistic as a function of \(F\), and compute the atom at the origin.

Step by Step Solution

3.55 Rating (155 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

In Exercise 185 the null hypothesis being tested is the same as Exercise 183 which is that the blo... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Applied Statistics And Probability For Engineers Questions!