Question: The null hypothesis being tested in Exercise 18.5 is the same as that in Exercise 18.3, but the alternatives are different: one implies exchangeability of
The null hypothesis being tested in Exercise 18.5 is the same as that in Exercise 18.3, but the alternatives are different: one implies exchangeability of block effects, the other does not. Discuss the implications of the fact that one statistic is strictly increasing as a function of \(F\), whereas the other is strictly decreasing for \(F<1\) and strictly increasing for \(F>1\).
Data From Exercise 18.5
Show that the REML estimate with positivity constraint satisfies \(1+b \hat{\theta}=\) \(\max (F, 1)\). What is the REML estimate for the second component? Express the constrained REML likelihood-ratio statistic as a function of \(F\), and compute the atom at the origin.
Step by Step Solution
3.55 Rating (155 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
In Exercise 185 the null hypothesis being tested is the same as Exercise 183 which is that the blo... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
