It was assumed that a given action would have the same cost when executed in any physical

Question:

It was assumed that a given action would have the same cost when executed in any physical state within a given belief state. (This leads to a belief-state search problem with well-defined step costs.) Now consider what happens when the assumption does not hold. Does the notion of optimality still make sense in this context, or does it require modification? Consider also various possible definitions of the “cost” of executing an action in a belief state; for example, we could use the minimum of the physical costs; or the maximum; or a cost interval with the lower bound being the minimum cost and the upper bound being the maximum; or just keep the set of all possible costs for that action. For each of these, explore whether A (with modifications if necessary) can return optimal solutions.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: