The following independent scenarios describe auditor decisions made during an audit engagement. 1. Chen Li worked on

Question:

The following independent scenarios describe auditor decisions made during an audit engagement.
1. Chen Li worked on the audit of Diagnostic Imaging Services (DSI), which provides diagnostic imaging services to hospitals in Ontario. Chen was assigned responsibility to
audit the allowance for hospital receivables. For the past several years, DSI’s accounting policy required that the recorded allowance for hospital receivables be set to equal the total amount of receivables over 180 days past due. Prior audit testing of the allowance in previous years has found that the subsequent write-offs of hospital receivables has closely approximated the amount included in the allowance. During the current year audit, Chen examined the amount recorded in the general ledger allowance account and reconciled that amount to the amount shown in DSI’s consolidated aged trial balance in the 180 days past due amount. Given that the dollar amounts agreed, Chen concluded that the allowance was in accordance with DSI accounting policy and fairly stated. While media reports and other industry publications suggested that recent regulatory changes in hospital funding were affecting hospitals’ ability to pay, Chen concluded that DSI’s allowance was fairly stated given the amounts complied with DSI’s policy.

2. Sherry Zipersky was assigned responsibility for evaluating the goodwill impairment testing process at Yukon Metals, Inc. Because Yukon Metals’ growth strategy was based mostly on acquisitions, the company had experience in performing annual impairment tests of goodwill. The client provided Sherry extensive information along with detailed schedules that documented management’s testing approaches, and it provided her support for key assumptions made by management. Sherry reviewed the schedules in detail and tested the key calculations. While Sherry’s firm has a number of valuation specialists as part of its staff, Sherry decided not to request their assistance in making an independent assessment of goodwill impairment given that the client’s documentation was extensive and it would take too much time to have the firm’s valuation specialists complete an independent assessment.
3. Jason Jackson was responsible for auditing the occurrence of sales transactions in the audit of Asheville Manufacturing. As part of his testing, he reviewed the contracts signed between Asheville Manufacturing and its customers to determine that the transaction terms justified the recording of sales for the year under audit. In addition, he examined documentation related to the sales transactions, including the customers’ purchase orders, shipping documents, and invoices generated by Asheville. The evidence examined supported the correct recording of sales in the current year. However, Jason also noticed in the customer files copies of email exchanges between Asheville Manufacturing sales agents and the customers suggesting that some of the terms of the sales agreements could be waived at the customers’ discretion. Jason decided to rely on the contracts and sales transactions documentation to conclude that the sales were properly stated, given that the other information was only included in emails.
4. Allison Garrett works on a number of audits of technology equipment manufacturers and has developed extensive knowledge and experience in the industry. On the recent audit engagement of financial statements for Zurich Technologies, Allison was responsible for auditing the valuation of inventories, including the reserve for obsolescence. Given her familiarity with the industry, Allison decided to conduct a quick substantive analytical procedure regarding the days in inventory and determined that the reserve was fairly stated, given that it was in line with reserves established by some of her other clients. She determined that additional evidence was not necessary to be obtained because of her experience with other clients.


REQUIRED
For each of the scenarios listed above, describe the most likely judgment trap that ultimately biased the auditor’s decision making in the audit.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Auditing The Art And Science Of Assurance Engagements

ISBN: 9780136692089

15th Canadian Edition

Authors: Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, Chris E. Hogan, Joanne C. Jones

Question Posted: