Question: Plaintiff contracted to install a boiler for defendant. After plaintiff had installed and tested the boiler, but before final payment to plaintiff had been made,

Plaintiff contracted to install a boiler for defendant. After plaintiff had installed and tested the boiler, but before final payment to plaintiff had been made, defendant took custody of the boiler and operated it from mid-April to July 18, 1967. On July 18, while the paperwork necessary to conclude the contract was being processed, the boiler exploded. Note that the operative phrase here is “while the paperwork necessary to conclude the contract was being processed.” Does this mean that the defendant had not accepted the boiler since the contract was not executed? Had enough time elapsed from the receipt of the boiler to the explosion to assume acceptance?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

In contract law the concept of acceptance is crucial in determining when parties become bound by the terms of a contract Acceptance typically occurs w... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Principles Questions!

Related Book