Many species of small mammals (such as flying squirrels and marsupial gliders) have the ability to walk and glide. Recent research suggests that these animals choose the most energy-efficient means of travel. According to one empirical model, the energy required for a glider with body mass m to walk horizontal distance D is 8.46 Dm^2/3 (where m is measured in grams, D is measured in meters, and energy is measured in microliters of oxygen consumed in respiration). The energy cost of climbing to a height D tan θ and gliding a distance D at an angle θ below the horizontal is modeled by 1.36 m D tan θ (where θ = 0 represents horizontal flight and θ > 45° represents controlled falling). Therefore, the function

S(m, θ) = 8.46m^2/3 - 1.36m tan θ

gives the energy difference per horizontal meter traveled between walking and gliding: If S > 0 for given values of m and θ, then it is more costly to walk than glide.

a. For what glide angles is it more efficient for a 200-gram animal to glide rather that walk?

b. Find the threshold function θ = g(m) that gives the curve along which walking and gliding are equally efficient. Is it an increasing or decreasing function of body mass?

c. To make gliding more efficient than walking, do larger gliders have a larger or smaller selection of glide angles than smaller gliders?

d. Let θ = 25° (a typical glide angle). Graph S as a function of m, for 0 ≤ m ≤ 3000. For what values of m is gliding more efficient?

e. For θ = 25°, what value of m (call it m*) maximizes S? 

f. Does m*, as defined in part (e), increase or decrease with increasing θ? That is, as a glider reduces its glide angle, does its optimal size become larger or smaller?

g. Assuming Dumbo is a gliding elephant whose weight is 1 metric ton (10⁶ g), what glide angle would Dumbo use to be more efficient at gliding than walking?