If the RANS equation (17.5) is subtracted from the unaveraged (mathrm{N}-mathrm{S}) equation (17.1), we obtain the following

Question:

If the RANS equation (17.5) is subtracted from the unaveraged \(\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{S}\) equation (17.1), we obtain the following equation for the perturbation velocity:

\[\begin{equation*}\frac{\partial v_{i}^{\prime}}{\partial t}+V_{j}\left(v_{i}^{\prime}, j\right)+v_{j}^{\prime}\left(V_{i}, j\right)+v_{j}^{\prime}\left(v_{i}^{\prime}, j\right)=-\left(p^{\prime} \delta_{i j} / ho\right)_{, j}+v\left(v_{i}^{\prime}\right)_{, j j}+\left\langle v_{i}^{\prime} v_{j}^{\prime}\rightangle_{, j} \tag{17.53}\end{equation*}\]

Verify this equation. Take the dot product of this equation with the perturbation velocity. From this equation derive an equation for the turbulent kinetic energy shown below:

\[\begin{equation*}\left.\frac{\partial k}{\partial t}+V_{j} \frac{\partial k}{\partial x_{j}}=\left\langle v_{i}^{\prime} v_{j}^{\prime}\rightangle \frac{\partial V_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{j}}\left\{v_{j}^{\prime}\left[p^{\prime} / ho\right]+k\right)\right\}+v\left\langle v_{i}^{\prime} abla^{2} v^{\prime}\rightangle \tag{17.54}\end{equation*}\]

The LHS has the standard form for convective transport with a mean velocity and represents the substantial derivative of the kinetic energy. The terms on the RHS are written as the divergence of a flux vector, a generation term, and a loss (dissipation) term. This provides the rationale for the engineering model for \(k\) given by Eq. (17.47).

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: