You are given the task of patching the vulnerability in the XDR code shown in the aside on page 136 for the case where both data types int and size_t are 32 bits. You decide to eliminate the possibility of the multiplication overflowing by computing the number of bytes to allocate using data type uint64_t. You replace the original call to malloc (line 9) as follows:

Recall that the argument to malloc has type size_t.

A. Does your code provide any improvement over the original?

B. How would you change the code to eliminate the vulnerability?

uint64_t asize ele_cnt* (uint64_t) ele_size; malloc (asize); void *result =