Question: A made a contract to construct a house for Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised g the defense that the contract

A made a contract to construct a house for Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised g the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense? [Cooper v G. E. Construction Co., 158 SE2d 305 (Ga App)|

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Dynamic Business Law Questions!

Q:

Collegiate Publishing Inc. began printing operations on March 1. Jobs 301 and 302 were completed during the month, and all costs applicable to them were recorded on the related cost sheets. Jobs 303...

Q:

1- A made a contract for a house with B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is that a valid defense? 2-...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B . Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Subsequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?...

Q:

A made a contract to construct a house for B. Sub-sequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid...

Q:

1. Statute of frauds is used as a defense to a lawsuit and not as an offense. For example, S owns a lot that B wishes to purchase. They enter into a verbal contract whereby B will deliver $6,000 at...

Q:

Several arguments in defense of Carl Construction against Mr. House's nonpayment and future claims. 17 Fla. Jur 2d Damages 22 states: "For the breach of a construction contract, the contracting...

Q:

A car dealer acquires a used car for $ 14,000, terms FOB shipping point. Additional costs in obtaining and offering the car for sale include $ 250 for transportation-in, $ 900 for import duties, $...

Q:

Examine the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Web site (www.FASB.org) and determine how you can access the FASBs Accounting Standards Codification. Hint: Contact a financial accounting professor...

Q:

You are given the following information: U . S . India Chile Nominal one year interest rate 5 . 8 0 % 8 . 2 5 % 1 0 % Spot rate - - - - - $ 0 . 0 1 2 $ 0 . 0 0 1 1 Interest rate parity exists between...

Q:

Let x denote the time (in seconds) necessary for an individual to react to a certain stimulus. The probability distribution of x is specified by the following density curve: a. What is the height of...