Question: A made a contract to construct a house for B. Sub-sequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract
- A made a contract to construct a house for B. Sub-sequently, B sued A for breach of contract. A raised the defense that the contract was not binding because it was not sealed. Is this a valid defense?[Cooper v. G. E. Construction Co., 158 S.E.2d 305(Ga. App.)
- what is an implied contract and a quasi contract.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
