Give a counterexample to show that the following construction fails to prove Theorem 1.49, the closure of

Question:

Give a counterexample to show that the following construction fails to prove Theorem 1.49, the closure of the class of regular languages under the star operation.7 Let N1 = (Q1,Σ, δ, q1, F1) recognize A1. Construct N = (Q1, Σ, δ1, q1, F1) as follows. N is supposed to recognize A*1 .

a. The states of N are the states of N1.

b. The start state of N is the same as the start state of N1.

c. F = {q1} [ F1.

The accept states F are the old accept states plus its start state.

d. Define δ so that for any q ∈ Q1 and any α ∈ Σε,

Sõi (4, a) 81 (4, a) U {q1} qe Fi and a = e. q ¢ F1 or a + e 8(q, a) = q E F1 and a = €.


Show this construction graphically, as in Figure 1.50.


Theorem 1.49

The class of regular languages is closed under the star operation.


Figure 1.50

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: