In this problem, our goal is to complete the proof of the equivalence of the first and

Question:

In this problem, our goal is to complete the proof of the equivalence of the first and the second definitions of the Poisson process. More specifically, suppose that the counting process {N(t), t ∈ [0,∞)} satisfies all the following conditions:

1. N(0) = 0.

2. N(t) has independent and stationary increments.

3. We haveP(N(A) = P(N(A) 1) = A + 0(A), P(N(A)  2) = o(A). = 0) = 1 ->A + o(A),

We would like to show that N(t) ∼ Poisson(λt). To this, for any k ∈ {0, 1, 2,⋯}, define the function gk(t) = P(N(t) = k).

a. Show that for any Δ > 0, we havego(t + A) go (t) [1 - A + 0(A)]. =

b. Using Part (a), show thatg (t) go(t) = -1.

c. By solving the above differential equation and using the fact that g0(0) = 1, conclude that90 (t) = ext

d. For k ≥ 1, show that9k (t + A) = g(t) (1 - A) + 9k-1(t)A + 0(A).

e. Using the previous part show thatg(t) = -Agr(t) + gk-1(t),

which is equivalent to[egh(t)] tgk (t) = Xextgk-1 (t). dt

f. Check that the functiongk (t) = e-de e-t (xt) k k!

satisfies the above differential equation for any k ≥ 1. In fact, this is the only solution that satisfies g0(t) = e−λt, and gk(0) = 0 for k ≥ 1.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: