When the economy turned sour and a large number of people sought to sell their blood, the blood bank wrote a term in its contracts that, in order to sell blood to the blood bank, each “donor” had to sell at least three pints a month to it or would have to refund any payments made to them in a month where the quota was not met. This meant that the donors would be very low on their own blood supply. What might a court do when confronted by such a term in a contract? What would be the result?