The best choice of material for a light strong column depends on its aspect ratio: the ratio

Question:

The best choice of material for a light strong column depends on its aspect ratio: the ratio of its height \(H\) to its diameter \(D\). This is because short, fat columns fail by crushing; tall slender columns buckle instead. Derive two performance equations for the material cost of a column of solid circular section and specified height \(H\), designed to support a load \(F\) large compared to its selfload, the first using the constraints that the column must not crush, the second that it must not buckle. The table summarizes the needs.

image text in transcribed


a. Proceed as follows
1. Write an expression for the material cost of the column - its mass times its cost per unit mass, \(C_{m}\).
2. Express the two constraints as equations and use them to substitute for the free variable, \(D\), to find the cost of the column that will just support the load without failing by either mechanism 3. Identify the material indices \(M_{1}\) and \(M_{2}\) that enter the two equations for the mass, showing that they are \[M_{1}=\left(\frac{C_{m} ho}{\sigma_{c}}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad M_{2}=\left[\frac{C_{m} ho}{E^{1 / 2}}\right]\]
where \(C_{m}\) is the material cost per \(\mathrm{kg}, ho\) the material density, \(\sigma_{c}\) its crushing strength and \(E\) its modulus.

b. Data for six possible candidates for the column are listed in the table with this problem. Use these to identify candidate materials when \(F=10^{5} \mathrm{~N}\) and \(H=3 \mathrm{~m}\). Ceramics are admissible here, because they have high strength in compression.
Data for candidate materials for the column

image text in transcribed

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: