In 360-degree performance review programs, personnel evaluations are collected anonymously from employees knowing the manager being evaluated

Question:

In 360-degree performance review programs, personnel evaluations are collected anonymously from employees knowing the manager being evaluated (superiors, subordinates, and coworkers). These are tabulated and a consensus summary is provided to the manager. Each manager being evaluated also does a self-evaluation, and this is used to benchmark how closely the manager and the coworkers’ assessments match. About one-third of the managers match their coworkers, one-third have an inflated view, and one-third rate themselves lower. Those who overrate themselves tend to be judged “least effective” as perceived by their co-employees. However, these overraters are more common higher up in the organization.

a. What does the breakdown of three one-thirds indicate?

b. Offer some plausible explanation why over-raters are higher up in the organization. 

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture

ISBN: 978-0073375823

5th edition

Authors: James Brickley, Jerold Zimmerman, Clifford W. Smith Jr

Question Posted: