Question: Consider the following statement in predicate calculus: empty_class(C) X[takes(X; C)] (a) Translate this statement to clausal form. (b) Can you translate the statement into

Consider the following statement in predicate calculus:

empty_class(C)  ← ¬∃X[takes(X; C)]

(a) Translate this statement to clausal form.

(b) Can you translate the statement into Prolog? Does it make a difference whether you’re allowed to use \+?

(c) How about the following:

takes everything(X)   ∀C[takes(X; C)]

Can this be expressed in Prolog?

Step by Step Solution

3.47 Rating (163 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The first statement has the following clausal form empty classC takesdistinguished stu... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Programming Language Pragmatics Questions!