Question: Consider the following statement in predicate calculus: empty_class(C) X[takes(X; C)] (a) Translate this statement to clausal form. (b) Can you translate the statement into
Consider the following statement in predicate calculus:
empty_class(C) ← ¬∃X[takes(X; C)]
(a) Translate this statement to clausal form.
(b) Can you translate the statement into Prolog? Does it make a difference whether you’re allowed to use \+?
(c) How about the following:
takes everything(X) ∀C[takes(X; C)]
Can this be expressed in Prolog?
Step by Step Solution
3.47 Rating (163 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
The first statement has the following clausal form empty classC takesdistinguished stu... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
