Read the Case Rea vs. Paulson, Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994 and answer the following questions:
Question:
Read the Case “Rea vs. Paulson, Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994” and answer the following questions:
1. Describe additional facts from the full version of the case. Point out the facts that you believe may have made a difference in the outcome of the case.
2. Do you agree or disagree with the actual outcome, ethically or legally? Why or why not?
3. Did reading the full case change your mind about the ethical or legal actions of either of the parties or of the judge’s ruling? Why or why not?
4. Share a personal business experience related to this issue, if you have one. If not, discuss how you can apply this case to your future career.
5. Recommendations to prevent future legal problems.
a. How can businesses avoid this type of lawsuit or legal issue in the future?
b. Are there changes that companies or individuals need to consider to prevent legal problems of this kind in the future?
6. Write two paragraphs on how you would defend Larry in this case:
Expert Answer:
1 The case is based on the main facts that include undue influence favoritism lack of decision and ignorance Primarily undue influence dominates the entire case and every outcome in the case is trigge... View the full answer
