Andrew is a professional engineer technologist and owner of Aqua Engineering. Andrew recently learned that Engineer Bob, a former employee of Aqua Engineering who recently started his own firm (Sigma Engineering), is claiming "extensive project experience". A visit to the Sigma website lists "past clients" and "past projects". The list suggests that Bob was the Engineer of Record. However, Andrew was the Engineer of Record and was responsible for the design of the "past projects" referenced for "past clients" on the Sigma website. Bob was not the Engineer of Record on any of the projects suggested on the Sigma website. In fact, Bob was an engineer-intern for most of the tenure with Aqua Engineering. While Bob performed tasks for the clients on "past projects", Bob's role was as a junior member of the design team. How can Bob's action be evaluated? Question: Identify TWO stakeholders other than Bob and Andrew affected by this case. In your answer, a) list two stakeholders affected by this situation, and b) provide one complete sentence to explain how each stakeholder is affected (one complete sentence per stakeholder).