$115$ Completed

$01$:$12$:$48$

Successfuly signed in as voay$76$opm.

Amendments wartant clause protects the US citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, thus protecting their privacy rights. Although there are some excel e of the exception is that consensual searches without any warrants would not be considered as violation of Fourth Amendment rights. Mary and Martha were shar pants. When law enforcement officers came for searching the personal belongings of Martha at their house, she was not at home. However. Mary was there, and sh or the search without warront Police found some illegal documents in Martha's belongings and took them in their custody 'When Mortha carme baci, she got furtous forcement department under Fourth Amendment clause. What would be the likely outcome in this scenario?

artha would get protected under forth Amendment clause as she did not give her permission for the search without warrant.

Upon seorch the law enforcement deparment has found Hegal documents in the house, so seorch without warroat would not be veated as volation af fourth amencinent nght os Mathe was imet ctiminal act

Martha would not get protected as Mary being the co$-$occupant has provided ber consert

Worys concent to seorch the co$-$owned propenty yould not te alpoloved of per the Fouth Amendinent ciouse