$1$

$.$

Answer this evaluation questions in a $4$ positive way and in a $4$ negative way?

$2$

$.$

How am I going to present the the results $3.$ Conclude the evaluation for negative and positive

itle: Design of a Model for Augmenting Digital Forensics into Information System Audit in the Financial Sector

Objectives of the Study

The main objective of this research is to design a model that extends digital forensics to the information systems audit process in order to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability

$($

CIA

$)$

$$

$$

of information.

Here are five applicable questions that a researcher might ask an expert when evaluating the proposed model:

What are the key challenges currently faced in the integration of digital forensics with information system audits, and how does this proposed model address them?

This question aims to understand the practical difficulties in the current audit processes and how the new model might resolve specific issues, enhancing the effectiveness of audits.

From your experience, how effective are the existing standards and practices used in IS audits for ensuring the CIA of information systems? Are there particular areas where these standards fail or succeed notably?

This seeks the expert

$$

s insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current standards, helping to identify where improvements are most needed and how the new model could make a difference.

Could you identify any potential risks or drawbacks associated with the implementation of this model in real

$-$

world audits, particularly in the financial sector?

This question addresses possible challenges or limitations of the model when applied in the field, allowing the researcher to refine the model to better suit practical conditions.

How do you evaluate the proposed model's ability to validate the evidence collected during an IS audit? What mechanisms does the model use to ensure the evidence is both reliable and legally admissible?

This focuses on the forensic aspect of the model, crucial for the judicial or compliance use of the audit results, ensuring that the model meets legal standards for evidence handling.

In what ways could this model enhance the training and capabilities of IS auditors in the context of digital forensics? What additional skills or knowledge would auditors need to effectively use this model?

This question looks at the human factor, considering what training or additional competencies auditors would require to adapt to and fully leverage the new model in their work.