Question: 1. Based on the annual data for the U.S. manufacturing sector for 1899-1922, Dougherty obtained the following regression results. lny=2.810.53lnK+0.91lnL+0.047tse=(1.38)(0.34)(0.14)(0.021)R2=0.97,F=189.8 where y= index of real

 1. Based on the annual data for the U.S. manufacturing sector
for 1899-1922, Dougherty obtained the following regression results. lny=2.810.53lnK+0.91lnL+0.047tse=(1.38)(0.34)(0.14)(0.021)R2=0.97,F=189.8 where y= index

1. Based on the annual data for the U.S. manufacturing sector for 1899-1922, Dougherty obtained the following regression results. lny=2.810.53lnK+0.91lnL+0.047tse=(1.38)(0.34)(0.14)(0.021)R2=0.97,F=189.8 where y= index of real output, K= index of real capital input, L= index of real labor input, t= time or trend. Using the same data, he also obtained the following regression: ln(y^/L)=0.11+0.53ln(K/L)+0.006tse=(0.03)(0.15)(0.006)R2=0.65,F=19.5 a) Is there multicollinearity in regression (1)? How do you know? b) In regression (1), what is the a priori sign of lnK ? Do the results conform to this expectation? Why or why not? c) What is the logic behind estimating regression (2)? d) If there was multicollinearity in regression (1), has that been reduced by regression (2)? How do you know? e) Are the R2 values of the two regressions comparable

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!