1. For the project data in Table 5.2 (see slides), redefine the activity durations in terms of the PERT estimates presented as follows. If the other activity data are the same as presented in Table 5.2, compute the scaled CAF for each activity in the project and use the CAF criterion to schedule the project. Compare the CAF schedule to the ACTIM schedule. a, m, b Activity 1-2 2-3 1-3 3-5 1-4 2-4 4-5 1,2,3 7,8,9 2,3,4 9, 10, 11 7,8,9 1,2,3 0,1,2 2. Use the minimum total slack (Min TS) heuristic to schedule the resource-constrained project. If a tie occurs, use minimum activity duration to break the tie. Units of resource type 1 available = 10 Units of resource type 2 available = 15 Resource Units Predecessor a M b Type 2 Activity A B 1 2 4 Type 1 3 5 0 5 6 7 4 4 5 4 1 2 1 D 4 2 0 A E 4 3 5 4 7 3 4 2 F 5 7 A B,D,E 3 1 G 2 3 6 2 3. Using the computational approach presented in this chapter, compute the scaled CAF weight for each activity in Exercise 2 1. For the project data in Table 5.2 (see slides), redefine the activity durations in terms of the PERT estimates presented as follows. If the other activity data are the same as presented in Table 5.2, compute the scaled CAF for each activity in the project and use the CAF criterion to schedule the project. Compare the CAF schedule to the ACTIM schedule. a, m, b Activity 1-2 2-3 1-3 3-5 1-4 2-4 4-5 1,2,3 7,8,9 2,3,4 9, 10, 11 7,8,9 1,2,3 0,1,2 2. Use the minimum total slack (Min TS) heuristic to schedule the resource-constrained project. If a tie occurs, use minimum activity duration to break the tie. Units of resource type 1 available = 10 Units of resource type 2 available = 15 Resource Units Predecessor a M b Type 2 Activity A B 1 2 4 Type 1 3 5 0 5 6 7 4 4 5 4 1 2 1 D 4 2 0 A E 4 3 5 4 7 3 4 2 F 5 7 A B,D,E 3 1 G 2 3 6 2 3. Using the computational approach presented in this chapter, compute the scaled CAF weight for each activity in Exercise 2