1 Insula activity was previously shown to increase when people reported feeling "love". Insula activity was subsequently shown to be increased when people saw photos of their iPhones. A NYT article concluded that people love their iPhones. Why is this conclusion problematic?

Group of answer choices

Insula does not only activate with "love" but also to many other stimuli/situations/states.

People love lots of things.

The amygdala was also active when people saw their iPhones.

The insula is a multisensory brain region.

2.What logical fallacy of inference does the Singer et al. study exemplify?

Reverse Inference

Circularity

Independence of irrelevant alternatives

Forward inference

3.What evidence suggests that vmPFC activity is NOT explained by non-value factors?

vmPFC activity increases for higher willingness to pay ratings

vmPFC activity cannot be explained by motor preparation OR salience

Damage to vmPFC causes more GARP violations.

vmPFC encodes value even before motor actions can be prepared so cannot be explained by motor preparation that correlates with value.

vmPFC activity correlates linearly with willingness to pay ratings but not with salience

As the delay to a rewarding outcome increases, the subjective value should

Group of answer choices

Increase

Stay the same

Disappear

Decrease