Question: 1. seek the lowest cost demand allocation, which facilities are not optimal for production? Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic) Demand City Production and
1. seek the lowest cost demand allocation, which facilities are not optimal for production?
| Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic) | |||||||||
| Demand City Production and Transportation Cost per 1000 Units | Fixed | ||||||||
| Supply City | Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | Cost ($) | Capacity | |
| Baltimore | 1,675 | 400 | 685 | 1,630 | 1,160 | 2,800 | 7,650 | 18 | |
| Cheyenne | 1,460 | 1,940 | 970 | 100 | 495 | 1,200 | 3,500 | 24 | |
| Salt Lake | 1,925 | 2,400 | 1,425 | 500 | 950 | 800 | 5,000 | 27 | |
| Memphis | 380 | 1,355 | 543 | 1,045 | 665 | 2,321 | 4,100 | 22 | |
| Wichita | 922 | 1,646 | 700 | 508 | 311 | 1,797 | 2,200 | 31 | |
| Demand | 10 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 11 | |||
| Decision Variables | |||||||||
| Demand City - Production Allocation (1000 Units) | Plants | ||||||||
| Supply City | Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | (1=open) | ||
| Baltimore | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Cheyenne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Salt Lake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | ||
| Memphis | 10 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Wichita | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Constraints | |||||||||
| Supply City | Excess Capacity | ||||||||
| Baltimore | 8 | ||||||||
| Cheyenne | 18 | ||||||||
| Salt Lake | 16 | ||||||||
| Memphis | 0 | ||||||||
| Wichita | 24 | ||||||||
| Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | ||||
| Unmet Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Objective Function | |||||||||
| Cost = | $ 48,913 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
