1. seek the lowest cost demand allocation, which facilities are not optimal for production? Inputs - Costs,...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
1. seek the lowest cost demand allocation, which facilities are not optimal for production?
Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic) | |||||||||
Demand City Production and Transportation Cost per 1000 Units | Fixed | ||||||||
Supply City | Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | Cost ($) | Capacity | |
Baltimore | 1,675 | 400 | 685 | 1,630 | 1,160 | 2,800 | 7,650 | 18 | |
Cheyenne | 1,460 | 1,940 | 970 | 100 | 495 | 1,200 | 3,500 | 24 | |
Salt Lake | 1,925 | 2,400 | 1,425 | 500 | 950 | 800 | 5,000 | 27 | |
Memphis | 380 | 1,355 | 543 | 1,045 | 665 | 2,321 | 4,100 | 22 | |
Wichita | 922 | 1,646 | 700 | 508 | 311 | 1,797 | 2,200 | 31 | |
Demand | 10 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 11 | |||
Decision Variables | |||||||||
Demand City - Production Allocation (1000 Units) | Plants | ||||||||
Supply City | Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | (1=open) | ||
Baltimore | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
Cheyenne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
Salt Lake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | ||
Memphis | 10 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
Wichita | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | ||
Constraints | |||||||||
Supply City | Excess Capacity | ||||||||
Baltimore | 8 | ||||||||
Cheyenne | 18 | ||||||||
Salt Lake | 16 | ||||||||
Memphis | 0 | ||||||||
Wichita | 24 | ||||||||
Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Denver | Omaha | Portland | ||||
Unmet Demand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Objective Function | |||||||||
Cost = | $ 48,913 |
Related Book For
Practical Management Science
ISBN: 978-1305250901
5th edition
Authors: Wayne L. Winston, Christian Albright
Posted Date: