1. Superior Paver sued homeowners Pamela and Mark for $14,350 it claimed was still owed as extra...

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

1. Superior Paver sued homeowners Pamela and Mark for $14,350 it claimed was still owed as extra work incurred in installing concreate pavers in the driveway of their residence. Pamela and Mark had previously paid the $45,000 contract price, and they counterclaimed for $60,500 for the reasonable cost of making the contractor’s work conform to the contract. The evidence established that Superior did not install a proper base of 3” to 4” of crushed limestone before installing the pavers as required by the contract, which caused the pavers to move creating gaps between the pavers and causing water to flow into the garage. To correct the problem the pavers needed to be removed and the area excavated and replaced with a crushed limestone base before, again, installing the pavers. Superior claimed it had substantially performed the contract as their performance resulted in a fully usable driveway, and, the proper remedy, if any, was the reduction of the market value of Pamela and Mark’s property due to any defective performance. Superior further asserted that the cost of redoing the entire job would be economic waste.

The result?

2. A franchisee owner (Owner) of a popular hotel chain was bound by their franchise agreement with Mega Hotel Inc (Mega). Part of Owner’s obligations included that Owner maintain their 60 room hotel to at least minimum quality assurance standards. Owner’s hotel failed five consecutive quality inspections over two years, with the inspector noting damaged guest rooms, burns in the bedding, and severely stained carpets. Mega canceled the franchise agreement. Owner sued Mega for wrongfully canceling the agreement (breach of contract).

Owner’s defense against Mega cancelling the franchise was the following. The bridge repairs on the road leading to the hotel had adversely affected the hotels ability to live up to the franchise agreement. Further, the repairs made it commercially impractical for Owner to live up to the franchise agreement. For reasons such as the inability of hotel staff to arrive on time and properly clean the rooms. Will Owner’s defense prevail?