$1.$ This assignment provides two cases. Students are required to choose one of the given cases and analyse the case according to the given assignment format. $2.$ The assignment framework should have: $2\mathrm{.}1.$ INTRODUCTION ANALYSE and EXPLAIN the ethical issues in this case. $2\mathrm{.}2.$CONTENT $2\mathrm{.}2\mathrm{.}1.$ Examine the above issue from the perspective of ethical practice and community belief. $2\mathrm{.}2\mathrm{.}2.$ Support the above examination of issues by giving other relevance examples that occurred today. $2\mathrm{.}2\mathrm{.}3.$ Discuss whether such issues should exist or not. $2\mathrm{.}2\mathrm{.}4.$ Give any regulation or legal point of view if it is relevant. $2\mathrm{.}3.$CONCLUSION Suggest method that can be used to ensure the above issue will not occur again. CASE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY, MALAYSIA $[$CIVIL SUIT NO: WA$-22$NCvC$-128-03/2022]$ BETWEEN TERBANG LOGISTICS SDN BHD $...$ PLAINTIFF AND $1.$ ANFORT CORPORATION SDN BHD $($Company No$.200101017419/553176-$D$)2.$ AZARI ABD. RAHMAN $($Police No: SAC G$/13277)3.$ RAMLI MOHAMED YOOSUF $...$ DEFENDANT$-$DEFENDANT