1) Was method 1 or method 2 more accumate in determining the densify of the metal bar? Substantiate your ancwer with caleulations from part . 2). Was method 1 or method 2 more precise in determining the density of the metal bar? Substantiate your answer with calculations from part A. 3) Did method 3 or method 4 give higher precision results in part B? What reasons can you give why this technique would be more precise? 4) Should you have the same number of significant figures for the volume of the metal eylinder in part A, line 4 and part A, line 11? Explain! 5) How will each of the following experimental errors influence the results of your calculated densities you reported? State whether the error will tend to make your density results too large, too small or unchanged. Explain why this would occur by identifying which measurements would be affected (high or low) and how this would affect the calculated density. a) In method 2, the metal cylinder you used had a number of air bubbles on its when immersed in the water. In method 3, the graduated cylinder contained water in it when you first weighed it, before you ever added the salt water