1) What makes this a correlational study? 2) The original study tested this correlational two times, in study 2a and study 2b. The original correlationals were r = .20, 95% Cl [.03,.36] and r = .33, 95% Cl [.15, .49]. Given these two previously published confidence intervals, are you surprised by the results you got? Why do you think your results are the same, or different from, the Oishi et al., 2012, study? 3) What might be a third variable that could be associated with both numbers of residential moves and preference for chain stores? 4) Can your study support the casual claims that "moving a lot as a child cause you to prefer familiar national chain stores"? Why or why not? (Apply the three casual criteria)