Question: 13. Problem 5-55 A city has developed a plan to provide for future municipal water needs. The plan proposes an aqueduct that passes through

13. Problem 5-55 A city has developed a plan to provide for future municipal water needs. The plan proposes an aqueduct that passes through 150 meters of tunnel in a nearby mountain. Two alternatives are being considered. The first proposes to build a full-capacity tunnel now for $556,000. The second proposes to build a half- capacity tunnel. The maintenance cost of the tunnel lining for the full-capacity tunnel is $40,000 every 10 years, and for each half-capacity tunnel it is $32,000 every 10 years. The friction losses in the half-capacity tunnel will be greater than in the full-capacity tunnel. The estimated additional pumping costs in the single half-capacity tunnel will be $2,000 a year, and for the two half-capacity tunnels it will be $4,000 a year. On the basis of capitalized cost and a 7% interest rate, which alternative should be selected? 14. Problem 5-70 A cost analysis is to be made to determine what, if anything, should be done in a situation offering three "do-something" and one "do-nothing" alternatives. Estimates of the cost and benefits are as follows: Alternatives Cost ($) Uniform Annual Benefit ($) End-of-Useful-Life Salvage Value ($) Useful Life (years) 1 500 135 0 2 600 100 250 3 700 100 180 4 0 0 0 5 5 10 0 Use a 10-year analysis period for the four mutually exclusive alternatives. At the end of five years, Alternatives 1 and 2 may be replaced with identical alternatives (with the same cost, benefits, salvage value, and useful life). (a) If an 8% interest rate is used, which alternative should be chosen? (b) If a 12% interest rate is used, which alternative should be chosen? 15. Problem 5-124 A steam boiler is needed as part of the design of a new plant. The boiler can be fired by natural gas, fuel oil, or coal. A decision must be made on which fuel to use. An analysis of the costs shows that the installed cost, with all controls, would be least for natural gas at $30,000; for fuel oil it would be $55,000; and for coal it would be $180,000. If natural gas is used rather than fuel oil, the annual fuel cost will increase by $7,500. If coal is used rather than fuel oil, the annual fuel cost will be $15,000 per year less. Assuming 8% interest, a 20-year analysis period, and no salvage value. which is the most economical installation?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
To solve these problems well approach each one step by step Lets start with Problem 555 Problem 555 Objective Determine which tunnel alternative fullc... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
