Question: 13. Problem 5-55 A city has developed a plan to provide for future municipal water needs. The plan proposes an aqueduct that passes through

13. Problem 5-55 A city has developed a plan to provide for


13. Problem 5-55 A city has developed a plan to provide for future municipal water needs. The plan proposes an aqueduct that passes through 150 meters of tunnel in a nearby mountain. Two alternatives are being considered. The first proposes to build a full-capacity tunnel now for $556,000. The second proposes to build a half- capacity tunnel. The maintenance cost of the tunnel lining for the full-capacity tunnel is $40,000 every 10 years, and for each half-capacity tunnel it is $32,000 every 10 years. The friction losses in the half-capacity tunnel will be greater than in the full-capacity tunnel. The estimated additional pumping costs in the single half-capacity tunnel will be $2,000 a year, and for the two half-capacity tunnels it will be $4,000 a year. On the basis of capitalized cost and a 7% interest rate, which alternative should be selected? 14. Problem 5-70 A cost analysis is to be made to determine what, if anything, should be done in a situation offering three "do-something" and one "do-nothing" alternatives. Estimates of the cost and benefits are as follows: Alternatives Cost ($) Uniform Annual Benefit ($) End-of-Useful-Life Salvage Value ($) Useful Life (years) 1 500 135 0 2 600 100 250 3 700 100 180 4 0 0 0 5 5 10 0 Use a 10-year analysis period for the four mutually exclusive alternatives. At the end of five years, Alternatives 1 and 2 may be replaced with identical alternatives (with the same cost, benefits, salvage value, and useful life). (a) If an 8% interest rate is used, which alternative should be chosen? (b) If a 12% interest rate is used, which alternative should be chosen? 15. Problem 5-124 A steam boiler is needed as part of the design of a new plant. The boiler can be fired by natural gas, fuel oil, or coal. A decision must be made on which fuel to use. An analysis of the costs shows that the installed cost, with all controls, would be least for natural gas at $30,000; for fuel oil it would be $55,000; and for coal it would be $180,000. If natural gas is used rather than fuel oil, the annual fuel cost will increase by $7,500. If coal is used rather than fuel oil, the annual fuel cost will be $15,000 per year less. Assuming 8% interest, a 20-year analysis period, and no salvage value. which is the most economical installation?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

To solve these problems well approach each one step by step Lets start with Problem 555 Problem 555 Objective Determine which tunnel alternative fullc... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!