17:09 A ( N D52 0 56% @ { CourseOutline-H... Q : ANNEXURE | FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT 2 Question 40 (1 mark) In the case of Mayelane v Ngwenyama and Another (CCT 57/12) [2013] ZACC 14; 2013 (4) SA 415 (CC); 2013 (8) BCLR 918 (CC), the Constitutional Court summarised its approach to the development of customary law as follows: \"This Court explained ...what the resurrection of customary law to its rightful place as one of the primary sources of law under the Constitution means.\" The above statement by the court indicates that: A. Customary law must be understood in its own terms, and not through the lens of the legislation. B. Customary law is subject to the Constitution and has to be interpreted in the light of its values. C. Customary law is a fixed body of formally classified and easily ascertainable rules. D. Customary law will no longer continue to evolve within the context of its values and norms consistently with the new Constitution of South Africa. 138 HCONL330-1-Jul-Dec2024-FA2-Memo-JJ-V4-28052024 1 O