1.What is supplemental jurisdiction?

es.

2.What is an anchor claim?

3.What type of claim acquires supplemental jurisdiction?

4.Which types of claims can acquire supplemental jurisdiction?

5.Which types of claims cannot acquire supplemental jurisdiction?

6.What is a counterclaim?

7.What is a crossclaim?

8.Hint: Read the hypothetical and then draw a diagram to help you keep track of everything.

Neighbors Awanata and Leyati lived next door to Pakuna. The neighbors did not have the best relationship, with ongoing spats results in missing or broken tools borrowed, boundaries lines disputes during the building of a new shared fence, and payment for the new shared fence. Also, Pakuna felt Awanata and Leyati were rude since their music was always loud. Meanwhile Awanata and Leyati felt Pakuna was rude since her business products occasionally left residue and ash requiring them to get their cars and patio furniture cleaned with some frequency.

One day, when the weather was nice the neighbors went out to their respective backyards to get some things done. Leyati went out to do some frying, and when he was finished he turned off the outdoor stove, and left the cooking oil sitting in the pot, and went to go eat on the patio. Suddenly he hears his phone inside and went to go grab it.

On the other side of the fence was Pakuna working on homemade fireworks for her small business. These fireworks were small, and weak. Generally, these fireworks were safe if handled properly. While testing some new products an enflamed bit coming back down landed over the fence into the cooking oil Leyati left out.

Without either neighbor realizing it, the spark grew into a fire, and burned down the new fence between the properties, as well as part of each's respective property before it was put out by the fire department. If it were not for the cooking oil, the falling bit would have likely been snuffed out on its own, and such damage would not have occurred.

Afterwards Pakuna sues Awanata and Leyati for damages. In response Awanata sues Pakuna for damages. Simultaneously, Leyati also sues Pakuna damages. However, Awanata also sues Leyati to indemnifying her if the court rules in favor of Pakuna.

Awanata tired of these ongoing conflicts sues Pakuna for all the time she had to get her property cleaned as a result of debris from Pakuna's business. Awanata and Leytati also go to sue Pakuna for the cost of the shared fence that just put up, and was now burnt down. They also sued for Pakuna to pay for her side of the fence, which she should have done but never did.

What is an example of a compulsory counterclaim?

a. Leyati's lawsuit against Pakuna for damages from the fire.

b. Awanata's lawsuit against Leyati for indemnification.

c. Pakuna's lawsuit against Leyati for damages from the fire.

d. Awanata 's lawsuit against Pakuna for the cost to covering previous cleaning services.

9.Hint: Read the hypothetical and then draw a diagram to help you keep track of everything.

Neighbors Awanata and Leyati lived next door to Pakuna. The neighbors did not have the best relationship, with ongoing spats results in missing or broken tools borrowed, boundaries lines disputes during the building of a new shared fence, and payment for the new shared fence. Also, Pakuna felt Awanata and Leyati were rude since their music was always loud. Awanata and Leyati felt Pakuna was rude since her business products occasionally left residue and ash requiring them to get their cars and patio furniture cleaned with some frequency.

One day, when the weather was nice the neighbors went out to their respective backyards to get some things done. Leyati went out to do some frying, and when he was finished he turned off the outdoor stove, and left the cooking oil sitting in the pot, and went to go eat on the patio. Suddenly he hears his phone inside and went to go grab it.

On the other side of the fence was Pakuna working on homemade fireworks for her small business. These fireworks were small, and weak. Generally, these fireworks were safe if handled properly. While testing some new products an enflamed bit coming back down landed over the fence into the cooking oil Leyati left out.

Without either neighbor realizing it, the spark grew into a fire, and burned down the new fence between the properties, as well as part of each's respective property before it was put out by the fire department. If it were not for the cooking oil, the falling bit would have likely been snuffed out on its own, and such damage would not have occurred.

Afterwards Pakuna sues Awanata and Leyati for damages. In response Awanata sues Pakuna for damages. Simultaneously, Leyati also sues Pakuna damages. However, Awanata also sues Leyati to indemnifying her if the court rules in favor of Pakuna.

Awanata tired of these ongoing conflicts sues Pakuna for all the time she had to get her property cleaned as a result of debris from Pakuna's business. Awanata and Leytati also go to sue Pakuna for the cost of the shared fence that just put up, and was now burnt down. They also sued for Pakuna to pay for her side of the fence, which she should have done but never did.

What is an example of a permissive counterclaim?

a. Awanata's lawsuit against Leyati for indemnification.

b. Pakuna's lawsuit against Leyati for damages from the fire.

c. Awanata 's lawsuit against Pakuna for the cost to covering previous cleaning services.

d. Leyati's lawsuit against Pakuna for damages from the fire.

10.Hint: Read the hypothetical and then draw a diagram to help you keep track of everything.

Neighbors Awanata and Leyati lived next door to Pakuna. The neighbors did not have the best relationship, with ongoing spats results in missing or broken tools borrowed, boundaries lines disputes during the building of a new shared fence, and payment for the new shared fence. Also, Pakuna felt Awanata and Leyati were rude since their music was always loud. Meanwhile Awanata and Leyati felt Pakuna was rude since her business products occasionally left residue and ash requiring them to get their cars and patio furniture cleaned with some frequency.

One day, when the weather was nice the neighbors went out to their respective backyards to get some things done. Leyati went out to do some frying, and when he was finished he turned off the outdoor stove, and left the cooking oil sitting in the pot, and went to go eat on the patio. Suddenly he hears his phone inside and went to go grab it.

On the other side of the fence was Pakuna working on homemade fireworks for her small business. These fireworks were small, and weak. Generally, these fireworks were safe if handled properly. While testing some new products an enflamed bit coming back down landed over the fence into the cooking oil Leyati left out.

Without either neighbor realizing it, the spark grew into a fire, and burned down the new fence between the properties, as well as part of each's respective property before it was put out by the fire department. If it were not for the cooking oil, the falling bit would have likely been snuffed out on its own, and such damage would not have occurred.

Afterwards Pakuna sues Awanata and Leyati for damages. In response Awanata sues Pakuna for damages. Simultaneously, Leyati also sues Pakuna damages. However, Awanata also sues Leyati to indemnifying her if the court rules in favor of Pakuna.

Awanata tired of these ongoing conflicts sues Pakuna for all the time she had to get her property cleaned as a result of debris from Pakuna's business. Awanata and Leytati also go to sue Pakuna for the cost of the shared fence that just put up, and was now burnt down. They also sued for Pakuna to pay for her side of the fence, which she should have done but never did.

What is an example of a crossclaim?

a. Awanata 's lawsuit against Pakuna for the cost to covering previous cleaning services.

b. Leyati's lawsuit against Pakuna for damages from the fire.

c. Pakuna's lawsuit against Leyati for damages from the fire.

d. Awanata's lawsuit against Leyati for indemnification.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Supplemental jurisdiction refers to a US federal courts authority to hear additional claims relate... View the full answer