2 different paragraphs are two different questions with same options please answer them differently

For this case, the courts determined that parties are able to exclude their liability, even for Choose.! fundamental breach. Choose. Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company In this case, the concept is Rylands v. Fletcher "Remoteness" and the legal Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. principle is: damages are R. v. Spratt recoverable for loss and damage More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. which arise naturally from the AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. breach in the ordinary course of Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. Yin v. Liu this, or which were in the Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. contemplation of the parties at the Hadley v. Baxendale time they entered into the contract. Haig v. Bamford Donoghue v. Stevenson