Question: 39. Evidence-based management proponents argue that systematic reviews using transparent criteria are better than traditional narrative reviews. A key criticism of traditional narrative reviews is

39. Evidence-based management proponents argue that systematic reviews using transparent criteria are better than traditional narrative reviews. A key criticism of traditional narrative reviews is that authors may only select and present evidence that supports their view while ignoring or downplaying contradictory evidence. Which of the following flawed forms of reasoning does that represent?

Select one:

a. False cause

b. Hasty generalization

c. Cherry picking

d. Appeal to common belief

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!