Question: 39. Evidence-based management proponents argue that systematic reviews using transparent criteria are better than traditional narrative reviews. A key criticism of traditional narrative reviews is
39. Evidence-based management proponents argue that systematic reviews using transparent criteria are better than traditional narrative reviews. A key criticism of traditional narrative reviews is that authors may only select and present evidence that supports their view while ignoring or downplaying contradictory evidence. Which of the following flawed forms of reasoning does that represent?
Select one:
a. False cause
b. Hasty generalization
c. Cherry picking
d. Appeal to common belief
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
