Question: 4. Student: Why do we define deterministic finite automata using a set of final states? Wouldn't one final state suffice? Automata salesman: We uscd to

 4. Student: "Why do we define deterministic finite automata using a

4. Student: "Why do we define deterministic finite automata using a set of final states? Wouldn't one final state suffice?" Automata salesman: "We uscd to make thcm that way, but we found that they aren't as powerful as our current model." Justify the salesman's answer, by exhibiting a regular language L that cannot be accepted by any DFA with one final state. Hint: it is enough to consider finite L 02

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Databases Questions!