Question: 4. You run PR for a rm that has recently become embroiled in a scandal. You've been trying to keep it under wraps, but the

 4. You run PR for a rm that has recently becomeembroiled in a scandal. You've been trying to keep it under wraps,

but the media has caught wind of it. You know that themedia has two options: they can \"ignore\" (in which case both you

4. You run PR for a rm that has recently become embroiled in a scandal. You've been trying to keep it under wraps, but the media has caught wind of it. You know that the media has two options: they can \"ignore\" (in which case both you and the media earn 0) or they can escalate. If they escalate, you can either \"acknowledge\" the scandal (in which case the media earns 2 and your rm earns -2) or deny. If you deny, the media can either back-off or release the damning documents. If they backoff, you can also back off (in which case both you and the media earn -1 for wasting the public's time) or you can become more steadfast in your denial (in which case the media will release the documents and both of you earn -00 for the massive scandal that follows). If the media decides to release the documents, no matter what you do, both you and the media earn -00. a. Create a decision tree to present the various decisions that you and the media make. b. Many rms when embroiled in a scandal, have a policy of releasing a statement addressing the issue before refusing to comment on it even further. Using the decision tree above, explain why this strategy makes sense (NB: This is an example of a \"gossip war\" or, more generally, \"mutually assured destruction\"). 4. You run PR for a rm that has recently become embroiled in a scandal. You've been trying to keep it under wraps, but the media has caught wind of it. You know that the media has two options: they can \"ignore\" (in which case both you and the media earn 0) or they can escalate. If they escalate, you can either \"acknowledge\" the scandal (in which case the media earns 2 and your rm earns -2) or deny. If you deny, the media can either back-off or release the damning documents. If they backoff, you can also back off (in which case both you and the media earn -1 for wasting the public's time) or you can become more steadfast in your denial (in which case the media will release the documents and both of you earn -00 for the massive scandal that follows). If the media decides to release the documents, no matter what you do, both you and the media earn -00. a. Create a decision tree to present the various decisions that you and the media make. b. Many rms when embroiled in a scandal, have a policy of releasing a statement addressing the issue before refusing to comment on it even further. Using the decision tree above, explain why this strategy makes sense (NB: This is an example of a \"gossip war\" or, more generally, \"mutually assured destruction\")

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!