5 Matthew claims that the function g x x 2 5 is the inverse of the function of f x 2x 5 Which statement provides a correct analysis of Matthew s claim A Matthew s claim is correct because if you add 5 to g x and then multiply it by 2 you get f x B Matthew s claim is correct because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x and when f x is substituted into every occurrence of x in g x g f x x C Matthew s claim is incorrect because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x 5 therefore g x is not the inverse of f x D Matthew s claim is incorrect because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x therefore g x is not the inverse of f x