Maggle claims that the function g z 3 4 is the inverse of the function of f x 3x 4 Which statement provides a correct analysis of Maggie s claim A B C D Maggie s claim is correct because if you add 4 to g x and then multiply it by 3 you get x Maggie s claim is correct because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x and when x is substituted into every occurrence of x in g x gl Maggie s claim is incorrect because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x 8 therefore g x is not the inverse of f x Maggie s claim is incorrect because when g x is substituted into every occurrence of x in f x f g x x therefore g x is not the inverse of f x