5-22 Bar Code Policy You have been given the responsibility of developing the standards for bar coding the forms that will be scanned in the new imaging system your facility is implementing in about a year. You have 6 months to have all of the forms redesigned to accommodate the bar code. Research the use of the bar codes and use the information that you find to develop your policy. The policy should be written in the policy and procedure format and should include specific guidelines that forms developers should follow. Grading Rubric for Written Assignments RANGE OVERALL CRITICAL S THINKING A Writing Analysis, that excels in most synthesis, areas. The writing and makes up for evaluation of minor material are weaknesses with obvious and creativity and substantial. passion. Material is genuinely thoughtprovoking. Very good writing B+ Few errors which lacks the in logic fluency and though some complexity of the A minor paper. The writing weaknesses may be competent can be but dry. spotted. May be a thinner version of an A paper. Good writing that B Gaps in maintains evidence competencies in most and areas. insufficient links. Little evidence of analytical or evaluative thinking. THESIS/PURPOSE STYLE/TONE USAGE/GRAMMAR USE OF SOURCES Identifiable purpose or thesis supported with assertion (controlling idea). Substantial detail and evidence. Excellent control of language, clear consideration of audience. Sentence and paragraph variety appropriate for audience. Good consideration of audience. Paragraphing structure is strong. Most of the writing is cohesively strong. Grammar and punctuation issues are addressed correctly. Editing and proofreading are evident. Complete; correct documentation, integration of citations and paraphrases. No evidence of plagiarism. Few grammatical errors. Editing and proofreading are evident. A little over reliance on source material. Lack of original thought. Some weakness in audience identification. Sentences may be somewhat poorly constructed, A variety of grammar errors, but not distracting to the reader. Acceptable work but somewhat clumsy inclusion of sources. Too many direct quotes. Support may be weak at some points but still no major errors in unity or comprehension. Thesis has weak spots but continues to be evident throughout the paper. Minor points may be insufficiently developed. C Fair writing that meets average standards. D Below average writing. F Unacceptable writing; does not meet standards of the assignment No evidence of analytical or evaluative thinking. No creative or original thinking present, even though writing is average. Critical thinking is not evident. Thinking presented is chaotic, or it is missing completely. Thesis is generally vague or too broad. Support is weak, unconvincing, and not linked. Thesis is weak or missing. No relationship between thesis and support has been established. and word choice may be inappropriate at times. Definite weakness in reader identification. Sentence structure and word choice are simplistic. Inaccurate word choice, fragmented and monotonous sentences and little or no concern for the reader. Purpose or The writing thesis is missing. lacks The organization writing lacks and cohesion focus and at all levels. organization. It Impossible for shows a the reader to complete lack of follow. A variety of grammar mistakes. A pattern of errors that distracts the reader. Plagiarism may be a possibility. Some use of uncited paraphrasing. Problems include repeated grammar and usage errors distracting to the reader. Some sources incorrectly cited or not used or plagiarized. Reference page may not correlate to the texts. Generally has a grammar and/or usage problem in almost every sentence. Sources are not used or are used incorrectly. Reference page may be missing. Entire paper may be understanding or mishandling of the assignment. plagiarized. Note to Students: This grading rubric is a model that may help distinguishing between levels of composition. There is always an element of subjectivity to those distinctions. This as a guide used by the Instructor