Question: 7.4 Belief updating In this problem, you will derive recursion relations for real-time updating of beliefs based on incoming evidence. These relations are useful for

 7.4 Belief updating In this problem, you will derive recursion relations

7.4 Belief updating In this problem, you will derive recursion relations for real-time updating of beliefs based on incoming evidence. These relations are useful for situated agents that must monitor their environments in real-time. (a) Consider the discrete hidden Markov model (HMM) with hidden states Sc, observations Or, transition matrix Qij and emission matrix bik. Let Lit = P(S=101,02,...,04) denote the conditional probability that S is in the ith state of the HMM based on the evidence up to and including time t. Derive the recursion relation: 9jt = 2.1;(0) 439-1 ij where 24 = 6; (01)0139-1 Justify each step in your derivation-for example, by appealing to Bayes rule or properties of condi- tional independence. (b) Consider the dynamical system with continuous, real-valued hidden states X and observations Y. represented by the belief network shown below. By analogy to the previous problem (replacing sums by integrals), derive the recursion relation: P(Xx|91, 92, . - - , Y) ZP (412) dx11 P(ta[r1) P(31191, 92..- , Ye-1), where Ze is the appropriate normalization factor, 2x = dx P(yle) | d111 P(|21-1) P(811|31, 92...,811). In principle, an agent could use this recursion for real-time updating of beliefs in arbitrarily compli- cated continuous worlds. In practice, why is this difficult for all but Gaussian random variables? - Y1 Y2 (Y3 Y4 X1 X2 (XA 7.4 Belief updating In this problem, you will derive recursion relations for real-time updating of beliefs based on incoming evidence. These relations are useful for situated agents that must monitor their environments in real-time. (a) Consider the discrete hidden Markov model (HMM) with hidden states Sc, observations Or, transition matrix Qij and emission matrix bik. Let Lit = P(S=101,02,...,04) denote the conditional probability that S is in the ith state of the HMM based on the evidence up to and including time t. Derive the recursion relation: 9jt = 2.1;(0) 439-1 ij where 24 = 6; (01)0139-1 Justify each step in your derivation-for example, by appealing to Bayes rule or properties of condi- tional independence. (b) Consider the dynamical system with continuous, real-valued hidden states X and observations Y. represented by the belief network shown below. By analogy to the previous problem (replacing sums by integrals), derive the recursion relation: P(Xx|91, 92, . - - , Y) ZP (412) dx11 P(ta[r1) P(31191, 92..- , Ye-1), where Ze is the appropriate normalization factor, 2x = dx P(yle) | d111 P(|21-1) P(811|31, 92...,811). In principle, an agent could use this recursion for real-time updating of beliefs in arbitrarily compli- cated continuous worlds. In practice, why is this difficult for all but Gaussian random variables? - Y1 Y2 (Y3 Y4 X1 X2 (XA

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!