$8$

Multiple Answer

$5$ points

$\backslash$table$[[$Policy$,$Lena,David,Kathleen$],[\backslash$table$[[$Cancer$],[$research$]],1$st$,2$nd$,3$rd$],[\backslash$table$[[$Mass transit$]],2$nd$,3$rd$,1$st$],[\backslash$table$[[$Border security,$3$rd$]],1$st$,2$nd$,]]$

The table above represents the preferences, in order from lease $(3)$ to most $(1),$ of three voters in a democratic system. Assuming there is a $$2$ billion dollar allocation that can be made to any one of the three options listed, which of the following must be true? Select all that apply.

There is not a voting paradox and the outcomes will be consistent.

Kathleen values Mass Transit more than Lena.

There is a voting paradox that will result in inconsistent outcomes.

If Mass Transit is voted on against Cancer Research, Cancer Research will always win.

$$

Lena will vote for the money to be allocated to Cancer Research rather than Mass Transit.

Border Security will lose no matter what alternative it is competing with.